Published:
Thursday, 26 Jan 2012 | 1:00 PM ET
By: Alex Crippen
Executive Producer
 |
Getty Images
Warren Buffett's assistant, Debbie Bosanek.
|
Forbes contributor Paul Roderick Gregory got some attention
with his post Wednesday afternoon headlined "Warren Buffett's Secretary Likely Makes Between $200,000 and $500,000/Year."
Buffett's assistant, Debbie Bosanek, is
in the news after sitting in Michelle Obama's box for Tuesday's State of the Union address in which
President Obama repeated what Buffett has been saying
for years: "Right now, Warren Buffett pays a lower tax rate than his secretary."
It's part of Obama and Buffett's argument for
higher tax rates
on the nation's wealthiest taxpayers, with the implication that a
secretary doesn't get paid all that much and thus it is unfair she is
paying a higher tax rate than her extremely wealthy employer.
Gregory
appears to be trying to poke a hole in that argument by saying that at
her supposed income of $200K to $500K, Bosanek "is scarcely the symbol
of unjustice that Obama wishes her to project."
He assumes Buffett's tax rate is around 15 percent since most of his income comes from capital gains. Then, looking at
IRS data, Gregory finds that:
"...
taxpayers earning an adjusted gross income between $100,000 and
$200,000 pay an average rate of twelve percent. This is below Buffett’s
rate; so she must earn more than that. Taxpayers earning adjusted gross
incomes of $200,000 to $500,000, pay an average tax rate of nineteen
percent. Therefore Buffett must pay Debbie Bosanek a salary above two
hundred thousand."
While
we have no idea what Bosanek's compensation actually is, it does appear
that Gregory's argument is based on an "apples to oranges" comparison.
Buffett's "office staff" example, as laid out in his
New York Times op-ed
last fall, is that his total 2010 federal tax bill — "the income tax I
paid, as well as payroll taxes paid by me and on my behalf" — was 17.4
percent of his taxable income.
In
that op-ed, Buffett says that using the same calculation method, that
was a "lower percentage than was paid by any of the other 20 people in
our office. Their tax burdens ranged from 33 percent to 41 percent and
averaged 36 percent."
Gregory's
conclusion is based on just income tax rates, not payroll taxes,
compared to adjusted gross income, not taxable income.
As Forbes personal finance staffer Janet Novack
wrote in October, based on a
letter Buffett sent
to Rep. Tim Huelskamp, Buffett's effective federal tax rate was just
11.06 percent of his AGI. Novack writes in a comment under Gregory's
post that "just based on AGI" Buffett "pays an income tax rate below the
rate for those with AGI of $100,000 to $200,000."
While
it is possible Buffett pays his assistant a six-digit salary higher
than his own $100,000 per year, there does not appear to be any real
evidence to support a claim that she "must" be making more than $200,000
a year.